Welcome to Wargaming.net Wiki!
Variants

E 50 Ausf. M

Jump to: navigation, search

Hide filter

Show history:

Go

Legend: = minor edit.
To see and compare edits in different versions, please select any two edits.

Compare selected revisions
09:13, 9 August 2016(32 bytes)Redirected page to Tank:G73 E50 Ausf M
18:40, 1 June 2016(7,794 bytes)reworked some elements of In-game performance as well as expanded on some areas.
09:53, 7 July 2015(7,096 bytes)changing from "stupid" to "overconfident"
16:09, 13 March 2015(6,994 bytes)Undo revision 220743 by tiger52525:na (talk)
09:52, 4 March 2015(6,952 bytes)
  • (username removed)
13:16, 3 March 2015(6,994 bytes)Undid some vandalism by some kid crying because he had a hard time with the tank.
00:25, 2 March 2015(6,986 bytes)
12:16, 15 February 2015(6,956 bytes)
  • (username removed)
10:29, 15 February 2015(6,942 bytes)
  • (username removed)
10:27, 15 February 2015(6,957 bytes)
  • (username removed)
08:57, 14 February 2015(7,038 bytes)
  • (username removed)
08:47, 14 February 2015(7,463 bytes)
  • (username removed)
07:54, 14 February 2015(7,709 bytes)
  • (username removed)
07:46, 14 February 2015(7,666 bytes)
  • (username removed)
07:31, 14 February 2015(7,719 bytes)
  • (username removed)
17:35, 10 February 2015(7,703 bytes)Again, removes the category:Append label if you simply leave an N/A there for a section that will never be filled
11:03, 25 January 2015(7,714 bytes)gallery; historical accuracy
16:47, 20 October 2014(7,434 bytes)Removal of historical critique
10:39, 20 October 2014(7,890 bytes)history; historical gallery
12:36, 19 October 2014(7,891 bytes)history; historical gallery, that's an E-50 not E-50 Ausf M
02:49, 4 August 2014(7,218 bytes)The pros in question were either a. an opinion (yes, playerbase consensus counts) or b. too full of caveats to count as a pro.
01:36, 31 July 2014(7,184 bytes)Added video review
12:33, 30 July 2014(7,138 bytes)Grammar correction for previously added top paragraph.
18:54, 28 July 2014(6,597 bytes)Bringing down the size of pros/cons. Salesmanship, which you last pro item essentially was, should go either into the intro section at the top of the page or into the performance section. Pros/cons should be kept rather dry and simple.
17:52, 28 July 2014(7,001 bytes)made some small modifications to Pros/Cons and performance
Compare selected revisions
Show per page: