Jagdpanzer E 100
Version vom 2. November 2014, 12:32 Uhr Utworzono nową stronę "{{TankData|Tank= |InTheGame_pros= |InTheGame_cons= |InTheGame_performance= |InTheGame_research= |History= |HistoricalGallery= |Ref_references= |Ref_sources= |Re..." | Aktuelle Version vom 2. November 2014, 14:11 Uhr 1 Version | |||
Zeile 30: | Zeile 30: | |||
The attack of 1st Battalion and the M18 Hellcat tank destroyers of the 705th TD Battalion near Noville together destroyed at least 30 German tanks and inflicted 500 to 1000 casualties on the attacking forces, in what amounted to a spoiling attack. A Military Channel historian credited the M18 destroyers with 24 kills, including several Tiger tanks, and believes that in part, their ability to "shoot and scoot" at high speed and then reappear elsewhere on the battlefield and therefore appear to be another vehicle entirely played a large part in confusing and slowing the German attack, which subsequently stalled, leaving the Americans in possession of the town overnight. The Hellcat, due to its 76mm gun, had major difficulty penetrating the glacis of Panther tanks. Due to the almost absent armor of the Hellcat and its use of high flash powder the Hellcat made a relatively easy target for German tank crews. Tank destroyers, in contrast to the pre-war doctrine governing their deployment, came to attack enemy armour from long range from an ambush position, acting in essence like self-propelled anti-tank guns. The Hellcat had a gun that could penetrate roughly 88mm at 1000 m. The average combat range noted by the Americans for tank vs. tank action was around 800m to 900m. This was just enough to penetrate a Panzer IV frontally, a tank designed in 1939. If facing a Panther, a Hellcat would be facing a tank with roughly 140mm of line-of-sight armor frontally. Hypothetically, if the Soviet Union decided to invade the rest of Europe during the war, the Hellcat would face the IS-2 with a glacis of roughly 200mm line of sight armor. | The attack of 1st Battalion and the M18 Hellcat tank destroyers of the 705th TD Battalion near Noville together destroyed at least 30 German tanks and inflicted 500 to 1000 casualties on the attacking forces, in what amounted to a spoiling attack. A Military Channel historian credited the M18 destroyers with 24 kills, including several Tiger tanks, and believes that in part, their ability to "shoot and scoot" at high speed and then reappear elsewhere on the battlefield and therefore appear to be another vehicle entirely played a large part in confusing and slowing the German attack, which subsequently stalled, leaving the Americans in possession of the town overnight. The Hellcat, due to its 76mm gun, had major difficulty penetrating the glacis of Panther tanks. Due to the almost absent armor of the Hellcat and its use of high flash powder the Hellcat made a relatively easy target for German tank crews. Tank destroyers, in contrast to the pre-war doctrine governing their deployment, came to attack enemy armour from long range from an ambush position, acting in essence like self-propelled anti-tank guns. The Hellcat had a gun that could penetrate roughly 88mm at 1000 m. The average combat range noted by the Americans for tank vs. tank action was around 800m to 900m. This was just enough to penetrate a Panzer IV frontally, a tank designed in 1939. If facing a Panther, a Hellcat would be facing a tank with roughly 140mm of line-of-sight armor frontally. Hypothetically, if the Soviet Union decided to invade the rest of Europe during the war, the Hellcat would face the IS-2 with a glacis of roughly 200mm line of sight armor. | |||
? | == Tank Destroyer Doctrine ==[[image:Irsch, Germany.jpg|thumb|200px|left|Irsch, Germany]] | + | == Tank Destroyer Doctrine == | |
+ | [[image:Irsch, Germany.jpg|thumb|200px|left|Irsch, Germany]] | |||
American prewar armored doctrine was based on using tanks solely in a support and exploitation role, usually in conjunction with infantry. Tank destroyers, such as the Hellcat, were to be used against tanks. To this end the Hellcat was not intended to engage in protracted combat, and had light armor and extremely high speeds to quickly respond to breakthroughs in the line by German armor. In reality, the opposite was true, as the attacks with the Sherman ran into defending German tanks far more often than intended. In Italy, TDs compensated for a shortage of 155mm artillery ammunition by using their 3 inch or 76mm guns in indirect fire role. Near the end of the war, there were so few German tanks that tank destroyers were increasingly used as self-propelled artillery in support of infantry for lack of any other targets. The Hellcat was theoretically supposed to be used independently as a sort of mobile anti-tank gun, brought up from reserves to buffer an incoming armored thrust. In practice a TD battalion was assigned nearly permanently to a division. The doctrine of the time had Shermans acting in support of infantry to break enemy defenses, and then leading the attack with infantry in support during exploitation. Prewar expectation was that all anti-tank work was supposed to be done by tank-destroyer crews, because attacking tanks could concentrate against a small part of a defending line. Independent TDs groups were to counter concentrate, to stop enemy tanks from penetrating deeply. Speed was essential in order to bring the Hellcats from the rear to destroy incoming tanks. Obviously this would make it harder for an armored force to achieve a deep breakthrough, a main objective of armor, if the enemy had tanks. It would also be easier for an opposing armored force to achieve a local breakthrough against an American tank battalion which would not have all of its anti-tank assets at the front during the beginning of any attack. Thankfully, for Sherman crews, this doctrine was not entirely used as it would create a small window of time of weakness in the armored battalion until tank destroyers moved to the front. TD battalions assigned to front line divisions often split up to companies attached to regiments, and platoons attached to infantry battalions. When so attached, defending TD units supplemented organic antitank weapons (bazookas and 57mm towed guns). | American prewar armored doctrine was based on using tanks solely in a support and exploitation role, usually in conjunction with infantry. Tank destroyers, such as the Hellcat, were to be used against tanks. To this end the Hellcat was not intended to engage in protracted combat, and had light armor and extremely high speeds to quickly respond to breakthroughs in the line by German armor. In reality, the opposite was true, as the attacks with the Sherman ran into defending German tanks far more often than intended. In Italy, TDs compensated for a shortage of 155mm artillery ammunition by using their 3 inch or 76mm guns in indirect fire role. Near the end of the war, there were so few German tanks that tank destroyers were increasingly used as self-propelled artillery in support of infantry for lack of any other targets. The Hellcat was theoretically supposed to be used independently as a sort of mobile anti-tank gun, brought up from reserves to buffer an incoming armored thrust. In practice a TD battalion was assigned nearly permanently to a division. The doctrine of the time had Shermans acting in support of infantry to break enemy defenses, and then leading the attack with infantry in support during exploitation. Prewar expectation was that all anti-tank work was supposed to be done by tank-destroyer crews, because attacking tanks could concentrate against a small part of a defending line. Independent TDs groups were to counter concentrate, to stop enemy tanks from penetrating deeply. Speed was essential in order to bring the Hellcats from the rear to destroy incoming tanks. Obviously this would make it harder for an armored force to achieve a deep breakthrough, a main objective of armor, if the enemy had tanks. It would also be easier for an opposing armored force to achieve a local breakthrough against an American tank battalion which would not have all of its anti-tank assets at the front during the beginning of any attack. Thankfully, for Sherman crews, this doctrine was not entirely used as it would create a small window of time of weakness in the armored battalion until tank destroyers moved to the front. TD battalions assigned to front line divisions often split up to companies attached to regiments, and platoons attached to infantry battalions. When so attached, defending TD units supplemented organic antitank weapons (bazookas and 57mm towed guns). | |||
== Post War == | == Post War == |
Aktuelle Version vom 2. November 2014, 14:11 Uhr
<value_unset_error>
Mouse over "
0 Kosten |
health Struktur |
0/0Expression error: Unexpected < operator./Expression error: Unrecognized word "konfiguration". t Höchstgewicht |
engine Motorleistung |
/ km/h Höchstgeschwindigkeit |
traverse Wendegeschwindigkeit |
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Expression error: Unexpected < operator. hp/t Leistungsgewicht |
NoNo Pivot |
// mm Wannenpanzerung |
//Konfiguration für Anfrage konnte nicht abgeglichen werden: turret:jagdpz_e100::top|armorturretfront/Konfiguration für Anfrage konnte nicht abgeglichen werden: turret:jagdpz_e100::top|armorturretside/Konfiguration für Anfrage konnte nicht abgeglichen werden: turret:jagdpz_e100::top|armorturretback mm Turmpanzerung |
//Konfiguration für Anfrage konnte nicht abgeglichen werden: gun:jagdpz_e100::top|damage1/Konfiguration für Anfrage konnte nicht abgeglichen werden: gun:jagdpz_e100::top|damage2/Konfiguration für Anfrage konnte nicht abgeglichen werden: gun:jagdpz_e100::top|damage3 HP Schaden |
//Konfiguration für Anfrage konnte nicht abgeglichen werden: gun:jagdpz_e100::top|penetration1/Konfiguration für Anfrage konnte nicht abgeglichen werden: gun:jagdpz_e100::top|penetration2/Konfiguration für Anfrage konnte nicht abgeglichen werden: gun:jagdpz_e100::top|penetration3 mm Durchschlag |
r/m ▲
Expression error: Unrecognized word "konfiguration". r/m Magazine-fed Gun ▲
Expression error: Unrecognized word "konfiguration". Feuerrate Magazine-fed Gun |
▲
Magazine-fed Gun
▼
Clip-fed Gun
▲
Expression error: Unrecognized word "konfiguration". Clip-fed Gun
▲
Magazine-fed Gun
▼
Clip-fed Gun
▲
Expression error: Unrecognized word "konfiguration". Schaden pro Minute Clip-fed Gun
|
m ▲
Expression error: Unrecognized word "konfiguration". m With 50% Crew: Expression error: Unexpected < operator. m ▲
Expression error: Unrecognized word "konfiguration". Genauigkeit With 50% Crew: Expression error: Unexpected < operator. m |
s ▲
Expression error: Unrecognized word "konfiguration". s With 50% Crew: Expression error: Unexpected < operator. s ▲
Expression error: Unrecognized word "konfiguration". Einzielzeit With 50% Crew: Expression error: Unexpected < operator. s |
Konfiguration für Anfrage konnte nicht abgeglichen werden: turret:jagdpz_e100::stock|turrettraverseKonfiguration für Anfrage konnte nicht abgeglichen werden: turret:jagdpz_e100::top|turrettraverse deg/s Turmdrehgeschwindigkeit |
0° Waffenwinkel |
-°/+°-Konfiguration für Anfrage konnte nicht abgeglichen werden: gun:jagdpz_e100::top|depression°/+Konfiguration für Anfrage konnte nicht abgeglichen werden: gun:jagdpz_e100::top|elevation° Richtwinkel |
Konfiguration für Anfrage konnte nicht abgeglichen werden: gun:jagdpz_e100::stock|maxammoKonfiguration für Anfrage konnte nicht abgeglichen werden: gun:jagdpz_e100::top|maxammo rounds Munitionskapazität |
Expression error: Unrecognized word "konfiguration".Expression error: Unrecognized word "konfiguration". % Brandwahrscheinlichkeit |
m ▲
Konfiguration für Anfrage konnte nicht abgeglichen werden: turret:jagdpz_e100::stock|viewrange m With 50% Crew: Expression error: Unexpected < operator. m ▲
Konfiguration für Anfrage konnte nicht abgeglichen werden: turret:jagdpz_e100::top|viewrange Sichtweite With 50% Crew: Expression error: Unexpected < operator. m |
m ▲
Konfiguration für Anfrage konnte nicht abgeglichen werden: radio:jagdpz_e100::stock|distance m With 50% Crew: Expression error: Unexpected < operator. m ▲
Konfiguration für Anfrage konnte nicht abgeglichen werden: radio:jagdpz_e100::top|distance Funkreichweite With 50% Crew: Expression error: Unexpected < operator. m |
Der <value_unset_error> ist ein [[|]] der Stufe .
<value_unset_error>
Der <value_unset_error> markiert das Ende seiner Linie .
Module / Verfügbare Zubehörteile und Verbrauchsgegenstände
Module
Verfügbare Zubehörteile
Verfügbare Verbrauchsgegenstände
Galerie
History for this tank not found
Light Tanks | |
Medium Tanks | |
Heavy Tanks | |
Tank Destroyers | |
Self-Propelled Artillery |
USA | |
UK | |
Germany | |
France | |
USSR | |
China | |
Japan | |
Czechoslovakia | |
Sweden | |
Poland | |
Italy |