Druid
127 mm/56 QF on a Mk.N2 twin mount2 х 2 pcs. |
Rate of Fire31.58 shots/min. |
Reload Time1.9 sec. |
Rotation Speed25 deg./sec. |
180 Degree Turn Time7.2 sec. |
Firing Range12.1 km. |
Maximum Dispersion105 m. |
Chance of Fire on Target Caused by HE Shell0 % |
AP Shell127 mm AP 58 lb Mk N2 |
Maximum AP Shell Damage2,200 |
Initial AP Shell Velocity975 m./s. |
AP Shell Weight23 kg. |
127 mm/56 QF on a Mk.N2 twin mount2 х 2 pcs. |
. . . Average Damage per Second70 |
. . . Firing Range5.01 km. |
20 mm Oerlikon Mk.II on a Mk.V mount8 х 2 pcs. |
. . . Average Damage per Second48.8 |
. . . Firing Range2.01 km. |
40 mm/56 OQF Mk.IX on a Mk.VI mount4 х 6 pcs. |
. . . Average Damage per Second80.8 |
. . . Firing Range3.51 km. |
Maximum Speed35 knot |
Turning Circle Radius690 m. |
Rudder Shift Time5.4 sec. |
Surface Detectability Range8.16 km. |
Air Detectability Range4.08 km. |
Druid — British special premium Tier X destroyer.
After giving the green light to the construction of Daring-class ships, the Admiralty soon came to realize that their combat characteristics would not allow them to counter the new American and Soviet destroyers as equals. During the first half of the 1950s, design work commenced on ships that would be capable of opposing Project 68-bis cruisers owing to their new rapid-firing guns. These ships were also meant to serve as escorts for aircraft carrier groups and convoys, as well as to hunt down enemy submarines. While the project never reached the design drawing stage, the drafts were used as a basis for the project to build County-class guided missile destroyers.
Modules
Hit Points (HP) | Armor (mm) | Armor (mm) | Main Turrets (pcs.) | Secondary Gun Turrets (pcs.) | AA Mounts (pcs.) | Torpedo Tubes (pcs.) | Hangar Capacity (pcs.) |
Research price (exp) |
Purchase price () | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Druid | 25,300 | 10 | 20 | 2 | 8/4/2 | 0 | 0 |
Compatible Upgrades
Slot 1 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Slot 2 |
||||
Slot 3 |
||||
Slot 4 |
||||
Slot 5 |
||||
Slot 6 |
Player Opinion
Pros:
Cons:
Gallery
Historical Gallery