Talk:World of Warships
A NOTE TO ALL WHO WOULD PASS UPON THIS WIKI
If you remove the standard formatting for any page (indicated by a |(content type)= ), I will find out about it.
I will find you.
And I will block you for an appropriate amount of time.
The standard formatting is there for a reason people, use it or let it lie, but NEVER remove it.
ForcestormX:na (talk) 03:44, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Fair warning.
Former ships being included
I've been trying to help and keep the pages of the wiki up to date up to the 4,0 update and see it is well taken care of. However I think its important to keep former ships used during testing that are no longer being used in the game. I noticed that some of the pages have some inconsistencies that need to be corrected. For example, the Cruiser section has different ships that the same section if you were to click a nation and their cruisers. (I,E. Katori is in the Cruiser section under Japan and the Hashidate is in the Japanese Cruiser section.) I don't think either of these ships should be dismissed but both should be included in each section.
Below are some ships no longer available now or later from testing that should still remain in the wiki no mater where you look. These ships also still remain in the Ship class sections as well.
-Katori -Albany -Kitakami
- Katori being displayed was due to an outdated page cache, that should be fixed now. As for legacy ships, the WG policy is that as long as the ship isn't available to the general populace, it will remain hidden for the time being. Sometimes there are exceptions, but I'm not the one who make these rules. --Haswell:na (talk) 06:09, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
ok, i didn't know of such rules. I figured if the ship existed in the game at any point in time it could be included. Another ship i was going to ad was the Saipan Carrier. But basically if the ship is 100% unplayable, its not included in the wiki.