Welcome to Wargaming.net Wiki!
Variants

Type 2597 Chi-Ha

Jump to: navigation, search

Hide filter

Show history:

Go

Legend: = minor edit.
To see and compare edits in different versions, please select any two edits.

Compare selected revisions
20:41, 29 October 2014(15,519 bytes)more or less same as japanese
15:34, 5 October 2014(15,578 bytes)added con about camo value on the move
17:03, 28 September 2014(15,459 bytes)Updated some info related to the changes in the tanks' parameters in the player opinion, edited pros and cons, somewhat supplemented the player opinion section as well as the research section.
03:25, 21 July 2014(15,518 bytes)Language, and a specific tank comparison were removed. It should be possible to get the sense across without relying on the reader to have driven another particular tank.
19:12, 18 September 2013(15,389 bytes)I seem to lose crew members all the time in this tank. Actually, this is the first tank in where I lost all crew members and died without exploding.
03:01, 5 August 2013(15,368 bytes)Remove mistaken statement that Japan exported the Chi Ha to China
23:36, 19 July 2013(15,506 bytes)CHi-Ha`s kill my AMX 40, so i should at least tell players that the Chi-Ha is a good tank.
05:57, 23 June 2013(15,466 bytes)added "many people play this stock because of the second turret+final gun res. cost"
15:22, 19 April 2013(15,169 bytes)Undo revision 45277 by 10DannyRush (talk)While we respect your opinion, the majority of the player base would not agree with your assessment.
20:06, 17 April 2013(15,169 bytes)Undo revision 45237 by 10DannyRush (talk) That's a bit of a stretch.
21:54, 7 February 2013(15,169 bytes)put stuff in for suggested modules
17:19, 18 January 2013(3,662 bytes)Undo revision 41439 by An Enemy (talk) Its here, not "it is".
09:17, 17 January 2013(218 bytes)Created page with "{{TankData | |InTheGame_pros= |InTheGame_cons= |InTheGame_performance= |InTheGame_research= |InTheGame_equipment= |Gallery= |History= |HistoricalGallery= |Ref_re..."
Compare selected revisions
Show per page: