Welcome to Wargaming.net Wiki!


Jump to: navigation, search

Hide filter

Show history:


Legend: = minor edit.
To see and compare edits in different versions, please select any two edits.

Compare selected revisions
13:06, 8 August 2016(27 bytes)Redirected page to Tank:R13 KV-1s
13:41, 8 September 2015(6,477 bytes)relevant variants from wikipedia
13:25, 8 September 2015(5,974 bytes)updated history with current version on wikipedia
12:04, 12 October 2014(6,343 bytes)Rewritten In-Game Preformance (9.3)
17:44, 25 September 2014(8,718 bytes)Editing pros and cons for KV-1S (9.3 version)
17:37, 25 September 2014(8,652 bytes)Editing pros and cons for KV-1S (9.3 version)
17:16, 25 September 2014(8,380 bytes)Edited pros and cons for KV-1S (9.3 version)
03:31, 21 July 2014(6,400 bytes)Reverted so as to better use the deleted text. Yes, in theory the two tanks in question don't have 175 effective, but they both have areas which are greater, or can achieve it with only a little smart play on their parts. Still, the point is not invalid and besides, there is the Tiger (P) which could have been a better example, so I made it generic. Other than the AMX (45), it's accurate now.
03:10, 21 July 2014(6,299 bytes)Neither the T29 nor the KV3 have over 175mm of effective frontal armor, or near that
17:39, 20 July 2014(6,394 bytes)Revised in-game performance
17:52, 10 July 2014(3,237 bytes)Undo revision 211053 by Dexter5021:eu (talk) Statpadding is irrelevant and not really something we can measure or want to encourage.
19:25, 3 July 2014(217 bytes)Created page with "{{TankData|Tank= | |Gallery= |InTheGame_pros= |InTheGame_cons= |InTheGame_performance= |InTheGame_research= |InTheGame_equipment= |History= |HistoricalGallery= |Ref_r..."
Compare selected revisions
Show per page: