KV-3
| Revision as of 15:26, 31 March 2015 |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 15:26, 31 March 2015
<value_unset_error>
Mouse over "
[Client Values; Actual values in
0  Cost |
| health Hit Points |
| 0/0Expression error: Unexpected < operator./Expression error: Unrecognized word "unable". t Weight Limit |
| engine Engine Power |
| / km/h Speed Limit |
| traverse Traverse |
| Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Expression error: Unexpected < operator. hp/t Power/Wt Ratio |
| NoNo Pivot |
| // mm Hull Armor |
| //Unable to match configuration for query: turret:r39kv-3::top|armorturretfront/Unable to match configuration for query: turret:r39kv-3::top|armorturretside/Unable to match configuration for query: turret:r39kv-3::top|armorturretback mm Turret Armor |
0/0/0
0/0/0 Shell Cost |
| //Unable to match configuration for query: gun:r39kv-3::top|damage1/Unable to match configuration for query: gun:r39kv-3::top|damage2/Unable to match configuration for query: gun:r39kv-3::top|damage3 HP Damage |
| //Unable to match configuration for query: gun:r39kv-3::top|penetration1/Unable to match configuration for query: gun:r39kv-3::top|penetration2/Unable to match configuration for query: gun:r39kv-3::top|penetration3 mm Penetration |
|
Expression error: Unrecognized word "unable". r/m ▲
Expression error: Unrecognized word "unable". r/m Magazine-fed Gun ▲ Rate of Fire Magazine-fed Gun |
|
Expression error: Unrecognized word "unable". ▲
Magazine-fed Gun
▼
Magazine-fed Gun
▲
Expression error: Unrecognized word "unable". Magazine-fed Gun
▲
Magazine-fed Gun
▼
Magazine-fed Gun
▲ Damage Per Minute Magazine-fed Gun
|
|
Expression error: Unrecognized word "unable". m ▲
Expression error: Unrecognized word "unable". m With 50% Crew: Expression error: Unexpected < operator. m ▲ Accuracy With 50% Crew: Expression error: Unexpected < operator. m |
|
Expression error: Unrecognized word "unable". s ▲
Expression error: Unrecognized word "unable". s With 50% Crew: Expression error: Unexpected < operator. s ▲ Aim time With 50% Crew: Expression error: Unexpected < operator. s |
| Unable to match configuration for query: turret:r39kv-3::stock|turrettraverseUnable to match configuration for query: turret:r39kv-3::top|turrettraverse deg/s Turret Traverse |
| 0° Gun Arc |
| -°/+°-Unable to match configuration for query: gun:r39kv-3::top|depression°/+Unable to match configuration for query: gun:r39kv-3::top|elevation° Elevation Arc |
| Unable to match configuration for query: gun:r39kv-3::stock|maxammoUnable to match configuration for query: gun:r39kv-3::top|maxammo rounds Ammo Capacity |
| Expression error: Unrecognized word "unable".Expression error: Unrecognized word "unable". % Chance of Fire |
|
Unable to match configuration for query: turret:r39kv-3::stock|viewrange m ▲
Unable to match configuration for query: turret:r39kv-3::top|viewrange m With 50% Crew: Expression error: Unexpected < operator. m ▲ View Range With 50% Crew: Expression error: Unexpected < operator. m |
|
Unable to match configuration for query: radio:r39kv-3::stock|distance m ▲
Unable to match configuration for query: radio:r39kv-3::top|distance m With 50% Crew: Expression error: Unexpected < operator. m ▲ Signal Range With 50% Crew: Expression error: Unexpected < operator. m |
0
The <value_unset_error> is a [[|]] tier .
<value_unset_error>
The KV-3 is defined by its lengthened and more heavily armored KV chassis, and a much rounder turret design. It can use a large variety of guns, but it's best known for the 122mm D-25T cannon, a weapon it shares with the IS. It sports an impressive 120mm of frontal hull armor, its turret is relatively well armored too, and the conical design makes bouncing frequent. When upgraded, it can mount the V-2SN engine, which gives a huge boost of horsepower. It is however much slower than the IS, and like the IS it lacks penetration compared to the German, French and US heavy tanks of its tier.
The <value_unset_error> marks the end of its line.
Modules / Available Equipment and Consumables
Modules
Guns
| Tier | Gun | Penetration (mm) |
Damage (HP) |
Rate of fire (rounds/minute) |
Dispersion (m/100m) |
Aiming time (s) |
Weight (kg) |
Price (  )
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <value_unset_error> | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Engines
| Tier | Engine | Engine Power (hp) |
Chance of Fire on Impact (%) |
Weight (kg) |
Price ( )
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <value_unset_error> | 0 | 0 |
Suspensions
| Tier | Suspension | Load Limit (т) |
Traverse Speed (gr/sec) |
Rmin | Weight (kg) |
Price ( )
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <value_unset_error> | 0 | 0 |
Radios
| Tier | Radio | Signal Range (m) |
Weight (kg) |
Price ( )
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <value_unset_error> | 0 |
Compatible Equipment
Compatible Consumables
Player Opinion
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Good max speed for its size (V-2SN engine)
- Almost impenetrable for lower tiers if properly angled
- High HP (1400)
- High alpha damage with the 122 mm cannon
- Tough frontal armor
Cons:
- Slow without the best engine
- Long silhouette
- Low accuracy
- Low penetration for its tier
- Not as mobile as the IS, especially in terms of turning speed
Performance
While the KV-3 has a wide array of weapons to choose from, there are really one two options worth considering. 107 mm ZiS-6 is the first one in the line and is probably already researched as it was available in the T-150. The 107 mm has less alpha damage than the 122 mm guns and does slightly less DPM as well, but has a more forgiving reload time and has cheap ammo. The 122 mm D-25T is simply more powerful than the 107 mm and has slightly better penetration. The increased power of the HE rounds should also not be overlooked, as they make a reasonable (and cheaper) alternative to APCR when facing higher tier opponents you cannot easily pen. However, the gun handles sluggishly due to its size, is the slowest and most inaccurate of the bunch, and its shells are very expensive. If you miss or bounce your shot, it's painful. The 100 mm D10T might look a bit bad on paper, having the lowest alpha and DPM, however it has the shortest aim time, is the most accurate weapon you can mount, has even lower ammo cost than the 107mm and a higher rate of fire. Being sluggish and unwieldy at first, after mounting the best engine this tank gains mobility and agility on par with the IS.
Lacking penetration for all its guns, the KV-3 is most effective up close where other tanks have trouble aiming down on the nearly unsloped frontal hull armor, though the large gun mantlet will now and then be penetrated by lower tier medium tanks at point blank range. While the IS has good frontal hull armor which is difficult to improve by angling the hull, the KV-3 has slightly worse frontal armor which is much easier to angle effectively, and becomes much more effective than the IS' armor. The upgraded turret might be as tall as a house, but that house can bounce. While the turret cheeks of the IS can be pentrated easily by most guns with 120 penetration or more, the KV-3's cheeks are narrower and extremely sloped.
Early Research
- It is possible to mount all upgraded modules onto the KV-3 without overloading the suspension (provided no additional equipment is mounted), so it is possible to ignore the Suspension until the end. However, the KV-3 is already quite bulky fully-upgraded, and the suspension's added traverse will help.
- The 10RK radio, the 107 mm ZiS-6, and the 85 mm S-31 carry over from the T-150. The V-2IS engine and 122 D-2-5T carries over from the KV-85 if you played that tank prior to this one.
- The acceleration on the KV-3 is anemic with the second turret without the top engine, inferior in hp/ton to the Maus even with the V-21S. Prioritize the research of the V-2SN, which will confer the KV-3 with a stately 11 hp/ton.
- Now you can unlock the second turret and then the 122mm cannons. Consider upgrading the suspension and engine if you haven't done so after unlocking the first 122mm, as the D-25T only offers improved DPM.
- The 100 mm D10T can be ignored entirely, unless you wish to elite the tank or intend to play the IS or T-44 in the future. You should pick up the top radio before moving on though as it's used on all Russian tier 8-9 tanks.
Suggested Equipment
Gallery
Historical Info
Development and preliminary design
In 1940, the KV-1 and KV-2 tanks were the heavy tanks of the USSR army. Even before the war started, the Soviet military recognized the need for more armor. The KV was only just in mass production, but an order was made for an improved version of it on June 17th, 1940. The tank factory in Kirov was to make 4 prototypes by the end of the year: 2 versions with 90 mm and 2 versions with 100 mm armor. Of the two types, one should be armed with an 85 mm gun, the other with a 76 mm gun.
The factory only managed to complete two of this prototypes: the 90 mm armored design with a 76 mm gun, basically an up-armored KV-1 tank, and a 100 mm armored design with the 85 mm gun. They were respectively called T-150 (or Object 150) and T-220 (or Object 220). Apart from extra armor, the T-150 only differed on some details from the KV-1 (an improved cupola and a new 700 hp engine are the most important changes). The inside of the tank didn't change, as the extra armor was mounted externally. During testing, the T-150 suffered from overheating in higher gears, even though outside temperatures were well below zero degrees centigrade.
The T-220 was a more radical innovation. The hull was lengthened, a wheel was added and a new gun, the 85 mm F-30 main gun, was mounted. The gun was already successfully tested on the T-28 that fall. Testing of the T-220 started at the end of January 1941, but after one day the 700 hp V-5 engine could not cope with the weight of 62 tons and failed.
Despite these problems, orders were received to mass-produce the T-150, under the name KV-3, in March, as the current tanks of the Soviet army were becoming more and more obsolete. However, the factory and the designers chose to concentrate on developing the T-220 instead, now under the name KV-220. The tank was tested extensively and received a new 850 hp diesel engine with supercharger. However, not only the engine was suffering from the weight of 70 tons. Suspension and torsion bars bent and twisted, and the transmission had problems as well. Still, the tank was able to complete nearly 2,000 km of testing before the start of Operation Barbarossa.
The factory started preparation for mass production again, but was stopped by the Soviet military. Intelligence showed that the Germans were also designing a heavy tank, so the Soviet design would become even more important. If it failed, the Soviet army would not have an adequate counter to the German threat. This meant the design of the KV-3 was again subject to modification of both hull and turret, and a new gun, the 107 mm ZiS-6, was to be mounted on the tank.
Moreover, new, heavier tanks were demanded, most notably the KV-4 heavy tank. With a design weight of 90 tons, this tank was too heavy to go in production, especially taking into account the problems with the transmission that were plaguing the much lighter KV tank. A KV-5 tank, with a hull height of 9 meters, was also ordered, but never got beyond the drawing board. Possibly the most feasible design proposal was the KV-9 heavy assault tank. With a weight of 48 tons, a 122 mm howitzer, and front armor of 135 mm, this was a much more realistic design. Two prototypes of the tank were completed, but the tank never went into mass production. Finally, a turretless prototype, the KV-7, was sent to Moscow for review. The tank mounted multiple guns, and was rejected by Stalin for this reason.
The fate of the prototypes
With the war underway, the KV factories that were experimenting with prototypes focused on mass production of the KV, the only Soviet tank that was truly feared by Germany at the time. The unfinished prototypes were ripped of their experimental turrets and guns and were sent to the front with KV-1 turrets. The T-220 (KV-3) model served under the 124th tank battalion and was destroyed near the Ust-Tosno railway bridge in December 1941. The T-150 was sent to the 123th tank battalion, but its fate is unknown.
Further development of the KV series was halted, but the experience of the testing was used to design the successful IS tank.
Conclusion
The KV was a heavy, slow-moving tank, but the Soviet army wanted something even stronger. That meant all parts had to be more durable and able to cope with more weight. During testing, it showed that the designers did not succeed in developing a reliable, versatile heavy tank based on the KV-tank. Ultimately the projects were stopped and the focus of the Soviet tank designers shifted to developing a tank with reasonable weight, good mobility, and sufficient armor. The IS tank was the logical result of their quest.
Historical Gallery
Sources and External Links
| Light Tanks | |
| Medium Tanks | |
| Heavy Tanks | |
| Tank Destroyers | |
| Self-Propelled Artillery |
| USA | |
| UK | |
| Germany | |
| France | |
| USSR | |
| China | |
| Japan | |
| Czechoslovakia | |
| Sweden | |
| Italy | |
| Poland |
