Revision as of 18:01, 21 May 2012 automatically edited by Snib's WoTWikiBot | | Latest revision as of 08:53, 17 May 2019 |
43 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown |
Line 1: | | Line 1: |
? | {{:{{PAGENAME}}/Sidebar}} | | + | {{Alert |
? | | | + | |i |
? | {{panel title|icon=[[image:USSR-Matilda II LL.png|link=|left]]|rMargin=248px|content= | | + | |content = This page is about the Soviet Lend Lease Matilda. The British Matilda can be found [[Matilda|here]]. |
? | The '''Matilda''' is a British tier 5 [[Gold Economy|premium]] [[Medium Tanks|medium tank]] that was provided to the [[USSR]] through the Lend-Lease Act. Though the Matilda is classified as a medium tank, when compared to similar-tiered vehicles it emerges about equal in terms of firepower and armor, but its low mobility lends this tank to be played more as a [[Heavy Tanks|heavy tank]]. Since it rarely sits at the top in a match, its ideal role is to play a support position and help destroy low-tier tanks; allowing your team's heavy tanks to focus on the enemy's heavies. Also, thanks to the high rate of fire of its gun, destroying incoming enemy scouts is fairly simple. | | + | |
? | }}{{:{{PAGENAME}}/Modules}}{{:{{PAGENAME}}/Equipment}}{{:{{PAGENAME}}/Consumables}} | | + | |
? | {{Panel Gallery|Gallery| | | + | |
? | image:Matilda screen 01.jpg{{!}}Matilda | | + | |
? | image:Matilda screen 02.jpg{{!}}Matilda | | + | |
? | image:Matilda screen 03.jpg{{!}}Matilda | | + | |
? | image:Matilda screen 04.jpg{{!}}Matilda | | + | |
? | image:Matilda screen 05.jpg{{!}}Matilda | | + | |
? | image:Matilda screen 06.jpg{{!}}Matilda | | + | |
| }} | | | }} |
? | {{History|info= | | |
? | The Infantry Tank Mark II known as the Matilda II (sometimes referred to as Matilda senior or simply an 'I' tank), was a British infantry tank of the Second World War. It was also identified from its General Staff Specification: A12. It served from the start of the war to its end and became particularly associated with the North Africa Campaign. It was replaced in service by the Infantry Tank Mk III Valentine. | | |
| | | | |
? | When the earlier Infantry Tank Mark I (also known as "Matilda") was removed from service, the Infantry Tank Mk II simply became known as the Matilda. | | + | {{TankData|Tank=Matilda IV |
| | + | |Though the Matilda IV is classified as a medium tank, when compared to similar-tiered vehicles it emerges more than equal in terms of durability, but its low mobility lends this tank to be played more as a [[Heavy Tanks|heavy tank]], specifically a tiny stock KV-1. |
| | | | |
? | == Development history == | | + | |Gallery= |
? | [[image:Matilda_II_Compass.jpg|thumb|200px|right|A Matilda II tank of the 7th Royal Tank Regiment in the Western Desert, 19 December 1940.]] | | + | |
? | The first suggestion for a larger Infantry Tank was made in 1936 with specification A12, and the contractor selected around the end of the year.[7] | | + | |
? | The Infantry Tank Mk II was designed at the Royal Arsenal, Woolwich[8], to General Staff specification A.12[1] and built by the Vulcan Foundry. The design was based on the A7[9] (which had started development in 1929) [10] rather than on the Infantry Tank Mk I, which was a two-man tank with a single machine gun for armament. | | + | |
? | When war was recognized as imminent, production of the Matilda II was ordered and that of the Matilda I curtailed. The first order was placed shortly after trials were completed with 140 orderd from the Vulcan Foundry in mid 1938.[11] | | + | |
| | | | |
? | == Design == | | + | |InTheGame_pros= |
? | The Matilda Senior[12] weighed around 27 tons (27 tons or 60,000 lb)[13], more than twice as much as its predecessor, and was armed with a QF 2 pounder (40 mm) tank gun in a three-man turret. The turret traversed by hydraulic motor or by hand through 360 degrees; the gun could be elevated through an arc from -15[nb 2] to +20 degrees.[5] One of the most serious weakness' of the Matilda II was the lack of a high explosive round for its main gun. A high explosive shell was designed for the 2 pounder, but for reasons unknown, it was never placed in production. With its heavy armor, the Matilda II was an excellent infantry support tank, but had to rely on its machine gun when operating with infantry units.[15] | | + | * Amazing gun depression/elevation, superior to even the American [[M4 Sherman]] |
| | + | * Decent DPM for its tier |
| | + | * Very high survivability in class, thanks to a combination of thick all-around armor, small size and high HP |
| | + | * Crew layout matches those of Soviet medium tanks from tier 7 onward |
| | + | * Preferential matchmaking (tier 6 max, no tier 7 battles) |
| | | | |
? | Like other infantry tanks, it was heavily armored; from 20 mm at the thinnest to 78 mm (3.1 inch) at the front, much more than most contemporaries. The turret armor was 75 millimeters (3.0 in) all round,[5] the hull side armor was 65 to 70 millimeters (2.6 to 2.8 in),[nb 3] and the rear armor, covering[clarification needed] the engine, was 55 millimeters (2.2 in).[5] The frontal armor was 75 millimeters (3.0 in), although the nose plates top and bottom were thinner, but angled. The turret roof was the same thickness as the hull roof and engine deck: 20 millimeters (0.79 in).[14] The German Panzer III and Panzer IV tanks, of the same period, had 30 to 50 millimeters (1.2 to 2.0 in) thick hull armour. The shape of the nose armour was based on the US Christie design,[16] and came to a narrow point with storage lockers added on either side. The heavy armor of the Matilda's cast turret became legendary; for a time in 1940–41, the Matilda earned the nickname "Queen of the Desert", although its weaknesses made this nickname difficult to justify.[17] At the time it was designed, this armor protection was impervious to the 37 mm and 50 mm caliber anti-tank guns employed by the German forces, as well as the 47 mm used by the Italians in North Africa; only the 75 mm PAK 40 could tackle it, although having to fire at dangerously close range, as well as the scarce 88 mm anti-aircraft gun used as an anti-tank gun. | | + | |InTheGame_cons= |
| | + | * Painfully low mobility: top speed, P-W ratio and terrain resistance values are all abysmal |
| | + | * Incompetent gun: even the premium APCR has serious difficulty engaging properly armored targets, also mediocre accuracy |
| | + | * Couldn't angle well due to large hull cheeks |
| | | | |
? | The weight of the armor, together with the relatively weak twin-engine power unit (the engine was adapted from that of a bus[18]) and complex, troublesome suspension, severely limited the speed of the vehicle. In the desert terrain of North Africa, the Matilda could average only about 6 mph (9.7 km/h). This was not thought to be a problem because the Matilda was specifically designed in accordance with the British doctrine of infantry tanks, that is, heavily-armored, but slow-moving vehicles designed to provide support to infantry; a speed equal to the walking speed of a man was considered sufficient. | | + | |InTheGame_performance= |
| | + | The Matilda IV is more like a heavy tank than a medium tank in playstyle. Like any other slow tank, it requires careful analysis of the enemy team composition and map layout in order to be able to ensure that it arrives in time to make a difference in the battle. |
| | | | |
? | Each engine had a coolant and lubrication system. The radiators were to the rear of the engine compartment over the transmission. The twin engine design doubled the maintenance effort for crews and often resulting in uneven wear and tear of components. The twin engines gave some redundancy. If one engine broke down, the tank could "limp along" on the other.[19] | | + | The '''76 mm ZiS-96''' has a phenomenally good aim time by Soviet standards, and has the rate-of-fire to make up for any shots that may have bounced or missed. Its primary failing is the low penetration, especially by the standards of Tier 5. The gun is nearly the same thing as the 76 mm ZiS-5 (the KV-1's stock gun) or the 76 mm F-34 (the T-34's intermediate 76 mm gun), but oddly way worse than the same gun on the [[KV-220-2]]; and even with APCR, it will have a very difficult time penetrating most heavy tanks and some sturdier mediums. The accuracy is also fairly disappointing, making long range shots and targeting weakspots in heavily armored tanks somewhat tricky. The ammunition capacity is also somewhat limited, given the high rate-of-fire, so shots must be taken with care. |
| | | | |
? | The tank was carried by 5 double wheel bogies on each side. Four of the bogies were paired on a common coil spring. The fifth, rearmost bogie was sprung against a hull bracket. Between the first bogie and the idler wheel was a "jockey wheel". The first Matildas had return rollers, these were replaced in later models with track skids which were far easier to manufacture. | | + | The Matilda IV boasts good armor for a medium tank, and this combined with its excellent gun depression (one of the best in the game) makes it very good at fighting on hilly terrain. Many lower tier tanks will have significant trouble penetrating it from most angles, but equal and higher tier tanks, especially heavy tanks and medium tanks armed with howitzers, will have very little trouble penetrating its armor It is also very important to avoid open areas and stay artillery-safe, because even though the Matilda IV does not take too much damage from lower tier artillery, they are still capable of wearing it down with repeated hits. |
| | | | |
? | The turret carried the main armament with the machine gun to the right in a rotating internal mantlet. Two smoke grenade launchers were carried on the right side of the turret.[20] The grenade launcher mechanisms were cut down Lee-Enfield rifles, each firing a single smoke grenade. | | + | The role in which the Matilda IV excels is that of flank protection. It will have absolutely no problems destroying any light tank and most medium tanks that it faces, and it has the HP to take a few hits. This makes it ideal for protecting allied heavy tanks from lower tier tanks and medium tanks, allowing the heavy tanks to focus on tougher targets. With the good HP, armor, and slow speed, it may be tempting to play like a heavy tank, but in that role the Matilda IV is very outclassed. In short, stick to side alleys, flanking passages, and allow your low pen but fast firing gun to take threatening mediums and light tanks out of harm's way of your team. |
| | | | |
? | == Production history == | | + | |InTheGame_research= |
? | The first Matilda was produced in 1937, but only two were in service when war broke out in September 1939. Following the initial order from Vulcan Foundry, a second order was placed shortly after with Ruston & Hornsby.[21] Some 2,987 tanks were produced by the Vulcan Foundry, John Fowler & Co. of Leeds, Ruston & Hornsby, and later by the London, Midland, and Scottish Railway at Horwich Works, Harland and Wolff, and the North British Locomotive Company Glasgow. The last were delivered in August 1943. Peak production was 1,330 in 1942, the most common model being the Mark IV.[22] | | + | As a premium tank, the Matilda IV does not have any modules to be researched. |
| | | | |
? | The Matilda was difficult to manufacture. For example, the pointed nose was a single casting that, upon initial release from the mould, was thicker than required in some areas. To avoid a needless addition to the tank's weight, the thick areas were ground away. This process required highly-skilled workers and additional time. The complex suspension and multi-piece hull side coverings also added time to manufacturing.[16] | | + | |InTheGame_equipment= |
| | + | Vents, Medium-Caliber Tank Gun Rammer, GLD, Coated Optics, Toolbox, Spall Liner, Binocular Telescope |
| | | | |
? | == Combat history == | | + | |History= |
| | + | The Soviets began receiving the Matilda infantry tank from the British via Lend-Lease in 1941, following the German invasion in June of that year. While they liked the thick armor, they were highly dissatisfied with the Matilda's low mobility, and especially its Ordnance QF 2-pounder gun, which not only had inadequate penetration but also lacked a useful high explosive round. In order to at least address the armament problem, the GAU (''Glavnoye Artilleriskoye Upravleniye'' - Main Artillery Directorate) began a project in November 1941 to rearm the Matilda with the 76 mm ZiS-5 that also armed the indigenous KV-1 heavy tank. |
| | | | |
? | ==== French Campaign of 1940 ==== | | + | One Matilda Mk. III was thus modified in December 1941, essentially by removing the complete gun and gun mantlet assembly associated with the 2-pounder gun, and welding in place the gun and gun mantlet assembly of the KV-1. The modified Matilda underwent trials that same month, but development was cancelled in January 1942, primarily due to conflict between the GAU and the GABTU (''Glavnoye AvtoBronetankovoye Upravleniye'' - Main Automobile and Tank Directorate), the body primarily responsible for Soviet tank development. The arrival of Matilda CS tanks under Lend-Lease that same year, which were armed 3-inch howitzers with adequate high explosive ammunition, and the increasing production of Soviet T-34 and KV-1 tanks also made the project superfluous. |
? | The Matilda was first used in combat by the 7th Royal Tank Regiment in France in 1940. Only 23 of the unit's tanks were Matilda IIs, the rest of the British Infantry Tanks in France were A11 Matildas.[23] Its 2-pounder gun was comparable to other tank guns in the 37 to 45 mm range. Due to the thickness of its armor, it was largely immune to the guns of the German tanks and anti-tank guns in France.[24] The famous 88 mm anti-aircraft guns were pressed into service as the only effective counter. In the counter-attack at Arras, although British Matilda IIs (and Matilda Is) were able briefly to disrupt German progress, being unsupported, their losses were high. All vehicles surviving the battles around Dunkirk were abandoned when the BEF evacuated. | | + | |
| | | | |
? | ==== North Africa 1940 to 1942 ==== | | + | |HistAcc= |
? | Up to early 1942, in the war in North Africa, the Matilda proved highly-effective against Italian and German tanks, although vulnerable to the larger and medium caliber anti-tank guns. | | + | Uses the same ZiS-5 gun as the [[KV-220-2]] (simply redesignated F-96 for this experimental upgrade), yet the penetration values are inconsistent. |
? | | | + | * The Matilda IV has the same twin diesel engines as the [[Matilda]] and [[Matilda Black Prince]], yet the engine power values are inconsistent. The Soviets never upgraded the original engines on their Matildas. |
? | In late 1940, during Operation Compass, Matildas of the British 7th Armoured Division wreaked havoc among the Italian forces in Egypt. The Italians were equipped with L3 tankettes and M11/39 Medium tanks, neither of which had any chance against the Matildas. Italian gunners were to discover that the Matildas were impervious to a wide assortment of artillery. Matildas continued to confound the Italians as the British pushed them out of Egypt and entered Libya to take Bardia and Tobruk. Even as late as November 1941, German infantry combat reports show the impotence of ill-equipped infantry against the Matilda.[25] | | + | |
? | | | + | |
? | Ultimately, in the rapid-maneuvering style of warfare often practiced in the open desert of North Africa, the Matilda's low speed and unreliable steering mechanism became major problems. Another problem was the lack of a high-explosive shell (the appropriate shell existed, but was not issued). When the German Afrika Korps arrived in North Africa, the 88 mm anti-aircraft gun was again pressed into service against the Matilda, causing heavy losses during Operation Battleaxe, where sixty-four Matildas were lost. The arrival of the more powerful 50mm Pak 38 anti-tank gun also provided a means for the German infantry to engage Matilda tanks at combat ranges. Nevertheless, during Operation Crusader, Matilda tanks of the 1st and 32nd Army Tank Brigades were instrumental in the breakout from Tobruk and the capture of the Axis fortress of Bardia .[26] The operation was decided by the infantry tanks, after the failure of the cruiser tank-equipped 7th Armoured Division to overcome the Axis tank forces in the open desert.[27] | | + | |
? | | | + | |
? | [[image:Matilda_II_German.jpg|thumb|200px|right|A captured Matilda put into use by the German forces is recaptured and its crew taken prisoner by New Zealand troops, 3 December 1941, during the battle to open the corridor to Tobruk: Operation Crusader.]] | | + | |
? | As the German army received new tanks with more powerful guns, as well as more powerful anti-tank guns and ammunition, the Matilda proved less and less effective. Firing tests conducted by the Afrikakorps showed that the Matilda had become vulnerable to a number of German weapons at ordinary combat ranges .[28] Due to the "painfully small"[29] size of its turret ring - 54 inches (1.37 m) - the tank could not be up-gunned sufficiently to continue to be effective against more heavily-armored enemy tanks. It was also somewhat expensive to produce. Vickers proposed an alternative; the Valentine tank, which had the same gun and a similar level of armor protection, but on a faster and cheaper chassis derived from that of their "heavy cruiser" tank. With the arrival of the Valentine in autumn 1941, the Matilda was phased out by the British Army through attrition, with lost vehicles no longer replaced. By the time of the battle of El Alamein (October 1942), few Matildas were in service, with many having been lost during Operation Crusader, and then the Gazala battles in early summer of 1942. Around twenty-five took part in the battle as mine-clearing Matilda-Scorpion mine flail tanks. | | + | |
? | | | + | |
? | ==== Minor campaigns ==== | | + | |
? | In early 1941, a small number of Matildas were used during the East Africa Campaign at the Battle of Keren. However, the mountainous terrain of East Africa did not allow the tanks of B Squadron, 4th Royal Tank Regiment, to be as effective as the tanks of the 7th Royal Tank Regiment had been in Egypt and Libya. | | + | |
? | A few Matildas of the 7th RTR were present on Crete during the German invasion, and all of them were lost.[30] | | + | |
? | | | + | |
? | ==== Pacific Theatre ==== | | + | |
? | | | + | |
? | | | + | |
? | Matilda in combat at the Battle of Tarakan | | + | |
? | In the Pacific, Japanese forces were lacking in heavy anti-tank guns and the Matilda remained in service with several Australian regiments in the Australian 4th Armoured Brigade in the South West Pacific Area. They first saw active service in the Huon Peninsula campaign in October 1943. Matilda II tanks remained in action until the last day of the war in the Wewak, Bougainville, and Borneo campaigns, which made the Matilda the only British tank to remain in service throughout the war.[3] | | + | |
? | | | + | |
? | ==== Foreign use ==== | | + | |
? | The Red Army received 1,084 Matildas.[3] The Soviet Matildas saw action as early as the Battle of Moscow and became fairly common during 1942. Unsurprisingly, the tank was found to be too slow and unreliable. Crews often complained that snow and dirt were accumulating behind the "skirt" panels, clogging the suspension. The slowness and heavy armor made them comparable to the Red Army's KV-1 heavy tanks, but the Matilda had nowhere near the fire-power of the KV. Most Soviet Matildas were expended during 1942, but a few served on as late as 1944. The Soviets modified the tanks with the addition of sections of steel welded to the tracks to give better grip.[3] | | + | |
? | | | + | |
? | == Use of captured Matildas == | | + | |
? | [[image:Matilda_II_Tarakan.jpg|thumb|200px|right|A Matilda II tank of the Australian 2/9th Armoured Regiment firing its three inch howitzer at Japanese positions during the Battle of Tarakan]] | | + | |
? | Following Operation Battleaxe, a dozen Matildas left behind the Axis lines were repaired and put into service by the Germans.[31] The Matildas were well-regarded by their German users [32], although their use in battle caused confusion to both sides, despite extra-prominent German markings.[31] | | + | |
? | | | + | |
? | == Variants == | | + | |
? | [[image:Matilda_II_Bovington.jpg|thumb|200px|right|The only surviving Matilda CDL, Bovington Tank Museum (2009)]] | | + | |
? | * '''Infantry Tank Mark II Matilda II'''[5] --- First production model[33] armed with a Vickers machine gun.[5] | | + | |
? | * '''Infantry Tank Mark II.A. Matilda II Mk II'''[5][33] --- Vickers machine gun replaced by Besa machine gun. The "A" denoted a change in armament.[5] | | + | |
? | * '''Infantry Tank Mark II.A.* Matilda II Mk III'''[5][33] --- New Leyland diesel engine used in place of AEC engines.[5] | | + | |
? | * '''Infantry Tank Mark II Matilda II Mk IV'''[33] --- With improved engines, rigid mounting and no turret lamp[34] | | + | |
? | * '''Infantry Tank Mark II Matilda II Mk V'''[33] --- Improved gear box. Westinghouse air servo used.[34][35] | | + | |
? | * '''Matilda II Close Support (CS)''' --- Variant with QF 3 inch (76 mm) [nb 4] howitzer firing smoke shells. These were generally issued to HQ units.[8][36] | | + | |
? | * '''Baron I, II, III, IIIA''' --- Experimental Matilda chassis with mine flail - never used operationally. | | + | |
? | * '''Matilda Scorpion I / II''' --- Matilda chassis with a mine flail. Used in North Africa, during and after the battle of El Alamain.[clarification needed] | | + | |
? | * '''Matilda II CDL / Matilda V CDL (Canal Defence Light)''' --- The normal turret was replaced by a cylindrical one containing a searchlight (projected through a vertical slit) and a BESA machine gun. | | + | |
? | | | + | |
? | ==== Australian variants: ==== | | + | |
? | * '''Matilda Frog (25)''' --- Flame-thrower tank. | | + | |
? | * '''Murray and Murray FT''' --- Flame-thrower tank. | | + | |
? | * '''Matilda Tank-Dozer''' --- Bulldozer tank. A hydraulic operated bulldozer blade of similar design to those fitted to the American M3 s. | | + | |
? | * '''Matilda Hedgehog (6)''' --- Officially known as the Matilda Projector, Hedgehog, No. 1 Mark I,[37] this fitted a Hedgehog 7-chambered spigot mortar in an armored box on the rear hull of several Australian Matilda tanks. The projector was elevated by hydraulics adapted from the Logan traversing mechanism used in M3 Medium tank turrets[37] and electrically fired either individually or in a salvo of six, from the 12 o'clock position.[38] The fifth tube could not be fired until the turret was traversed to 1 o'clock [38] to move the radio antenna out of the bomb's flightpath. Each bomb weighed 65 lb (29 kg) and contained 30 to 35 lb (14 to 16 kg) of high-explosive. The range was up to 400 m (440 yd). Aiming was accomplished by pointing the entire tank; the mounting had no independent traverse,[39] so accuracy was not spectacular, but adequate for the task.[38] Trials at Southport, Queensland, in May 1945 were pronounced a complete success, and the Projector would have been impressive against enemy bunkers, but the war ended before it was used operationally.[38] | | + | |
? | | | + | |
? | == Surviving tanks == | | + | |
? | Around 45 Matilda IIs survive in various degrees of preservation. The majority (around 30) are in Australia, either in museums or in private ownership. A notable collection is that of the Royal Australian Armoured Corps Memorial and Tank Museum, at Puckapunyal, Australia, which has five Matilda IIs on display. In Britain, the Imperial War Museum in London, and the Royal Armoured Corps Tank Museum in Bovington, Dorset, hold examples of the Matilda II. An Australian Matilda Tank-Dozer in running (restored) condition is also held by a private collector near Bathurst NSW. The Matilda II at Bovington is in running condition.[40] | | + | |
? | }} | | + | |
? | {{Panel Gallery|Historical Gallery| | | + | |
? | [[File:Matilda_italy.jpg|160px]] | | + | |
? | }} | | + | |
? | {{Panel content|style=collapsed|title=Sources and External Links|content= | | + | |
| | | | |
? | '''Notes''' | | + | |HistoricalGallery= |
| | + | File:MatildaLL.jpg{{!}}Matilda Lend Lease upgun experiment, rearmed with the ZiS-96 |
| | + | File:MatildaTank.jpg{{!}}Matilda Lend Lease |
| | + | File:MatildaSWF.jpg{{!}}Soviet Matildas being transported to the frontlines, about April 1942. |
| | + | File:MatildaSWF2.jpg{{!}}Soviet Matildas being transported to the frontlines, about April 1942. |
| | + | File:MatildaSovietPort.jpg{{!}}Soviet Matildas being off loaded in the Soviet port of Arkhangelsk (Archangel), about February 1942. |
| | | | |
? | '''Footnotes''' | | |
? | # Engine models A183, on the left hand side, and engine model A184, right hand side. | | |
? | # The WWII Equipment states that the gun could move through an elevation arc of -20 to +20 degrees.[14] | | |
? | # The 65 mm was made up of the hull itself and the side skirt armour [14] | | |
? | # The shell cartridge was 76.2 x 134R. On the Infantry Tank Mk IV, the Churchill tank, the gun was used for HE | | |
| | | | |
? | '''Citations''' | | + | |Ref_links= |
? | # a b c d e Jentz, p. 11 | | + | * https://tankarchives.blogspot.com/2017/04/end-of-rearmament.html |
? | # a b c Jentz, p. 13 | | + | |
? | # a b c d e f g h Bean, pp. 147–148 | | + | |
? | # a b "Matilda Infantry Tank". Doug's 'Heavy Metal' Gallery. Livesteammodels.co.uk. Retrieved 2010-02-15. | | + | |
? | # a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Jentz, p. 12 | | + | |
? | # Jentz, pp. 12–13 | | + | |
? | # Fletcher p4 | | + | |
? | # a b WWII Vehicles | | + | |
? | # "Arcane Fighting Vehicles - AFVs". Geocities.com. Archived from the original on 2009-10-28. Retrieved 2010-02-15. | | + | |
? | # "Britain's A7 Medium Tanks - World War II Vehicles, Tanks, and Airplanes". Wwiivehicles.com. 1940-05-10. Retrieved 2010-02-15. | | + | |
? | # Fletcher p8 | | + | |
? | # Fletcher (1994) p. 5 | | + | |
? | # WWII Vehicles citing various publications | | + | |
? | # a b c WWII Equipment | | + | |
? | # Hogg, Ian (1996), Tank Killing, Sidgwick & Jackson, pp. 138–139, ISBN 1-885119-40-2 | | + | |
? | # a b Fletcher (1994) p. 7 | | + | |
? | # Fletcher (1994) p. 14 | | + | |
? | # Fletcher (1994) p.6 | | + | |
? | # Fletcher p. 6 | | + | |
? | # Fletcher p. 8 | | + | |
? | # Fletcher (1994) p8 | | + | |
? | # Boyd | | + | |
? | # Fletcher p. 10 | | + | |
? | # Sebag-Montifiore, pp. 149, 153 | | + | |
? | # The CRUSADER Project: German Combat Report | | + | |
? | # Orpen | | + | |
? | # Murphy Chapter 14 and 15 | | + | |
? | # CRUSADER Project: Firing Trials | | + | |
? | # Fletcher p. 9 | | + | |
? | # Handel, Paul, Matilda Tanks at Retimo on the Island of Crete, Australian Army | | + | |
? | # a b Tucker-Jones, Anthony (2007). Hitler's Great Panzer Heist. Pen and Sword Military. ISBN 184415548X.[page needed] | | + | |
? | # von Mellenthin, Major-General F. W (1971). Panzer Battles: A Study of the Employment of Armor in the Second World War. First Ballantine Books Edition. ISBN 0345244400.[page needed] | | + | |
? | # a b c d e Fletcher pp. 12–14 | | + | |
? | # a b Mark Bannerman, Robert Oehler. Modelling the Matilda Infantry tank. Osprey. p. 6. | | + | |
? | # Fletcher, p 14 | | + | |
? | # Fletcher, p. 12 | | + | |
? | # a b Fletcher, David. Matilda Infantry Tank 1938-45 (Botley, Oxford, UK: Osprey, 2002), p.42. | | + | |
? | # a b c d Fletcher, p.43. | | + | |
? | # Paul Handel—Dust, Sand and Jungle, 2003 RAAC Memorial and Army Tank Museum, ISBN 1-876439-75-0.[page needed] | | + | |
? | # "Vehicle Displays and Exhibits". RAAC Memorial and Army Tank Museum. Retrieved 15 February 2010. | | + | |
| | | | |
? | ''' References ''' | | |
| | | | |
? | Bean, Tim; Fowler, Will (2002). Russian Tanks of World War II Stalin’s armoured might. Ian Allen publishing. ISBN 0-71102-898-2. | | |
? | Fletcher, David; Sarson, Peter (1994), Matilda Infantry Tank 1938–45 (New Vanguard 8), Oxford: Osprey Publishing, ISBN 1-85532-457-1 | | |
? | Jentz, Thomas L. (1998). Tank Combat in North Africa: The Opening Rounds, Operations Sonnenblume, Brevity, Skorpion and Battleaxe, February 1941 - June 1941. Schiffer Publishing Ltd. ISBN 0-76430-226-4. | | |
? | Sebag-Montifiore, Hugh. Dunkirk: Fight to the last man. | | |
? | "Britain's Matilda tanks". WWII Vehicles, Tanks and Airplanes. | | |
? | Boyd, David (31 December 2008). "Matilda Mk II Infantry Tank (A.12)". WWII Equipment. | | |
? | "CRUSADER Project - German Firing Trials 19 March 1942". CRUSADER Project. | | |
? | "Defending Position 19 - Combat Report of Company 11, 255th Infantry Regiment, November 1941". CRUSADER Project. | | |
? | Murphy, W.E.. The Relief of Tobruk. | | |
? | Orpen, Neil. War in the Desert. | | |
? | Perrett, Bryan (1973). The Matilda (Armor in Action). Ian Allan. ISBN 0711004056. | | |
? | Fletcher, David, The Great Tank Scandal - British Armour in the Second World War, Part 1, HMSO | | |
| | | | |
? | '''External links''' | | |
? | * [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matilda_II Wikipedia]] | | |
? | * [[https://www.onwar.com/tanks/uk/fmatilda3.htm OnWar - Matilda III]] | | |
? | * [[https://rkkaww2.armchairgeneral.com/galleries/Lendlease/Matilda.htm Photo Gallery of Matilda Tanks]] in Soviet service (rkkaww2.armchairgeneral.com) | | |
? | * [[https://the.shadock.free.fr/Surviving_Matildas.pdf PDF document]] listing surviving Matilda tanks. | | |
? | * [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TpbZLyh6VxU&feature=related (1)]] Video of Matilda II on show during Bovington Tankfest 2008 | | |
? | * [[https://books.google.com/books?id=WNYDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA81&dq=popular+mechanics+1943+The+Battle+Of+Brains&hl=en&ei=c12QTMHQJ8qTnQebpeS0DA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=popular%20mechanics%201943%20The%20Battle%20Of%20Brains&f=true Popular Mechanics, March 1943, Tank Crew Rub Elbows In British Fortress]] cutaway drawing of Matilda II | | |
| }} | | | }} |
? | {{USSR Tanks}} | | |
? | {{Medium Tanks}} | | |
? | {{Premium Tanks}} | | |