Pz.Kpfw. III/IV
| Revision as of 00:53, 19 August 2012 | Revision as of 23:35, 19 August 2012 fixed | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | |||
| :Valid and reflected on the page already. Additionally, the added maneuverability is very useful, but it still lacks the firepower of the Pz IV. --[[User:Aero37|Aero37]] 01:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC) | :Valid and reflected on the page already. Additionally, the added maneuverability is very useful, but it still lacks the firepower of the Pz IV. --[[User:Aero37|Aero37]] 01:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Additional Grousers are quite nice on this tank since it has more horsepower to counteract the weight (1000kg) than the PzIII or PzIV. --[[User:Trifler|Trifler]] 02:09, 18 February 2012 (UTC) | :Additional Grousers are quite nice on this tank since it has more horsepower to counteract the weight (1000kg) than the PzIII or PzIV. --[[User:Trifler|Trifler]] 02:09, 18 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ? | ||||
| ? | ||||
| ? | ||||
| ? | ||||
Revision as of 23:35, 19 August 2012
I have personally found that I prefer the Pz III/IV over the Pz IV. My main reason for this is that the sloped armor has saved my life more than once in a desperate scramble on the battlefield.
- Valid and reflected on the page already. Additionally, the added maneuverability is very useful, but it still lacks the firepower of the Pz IV. --Aero37 01:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- Additional Grousers are quite nice on this tank since it has more horsepower to counteract the weight (1000kg) than the PzIII or PzIV. --Trifler 02:09, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
