T110E5

The Damage per round under Cons isn't very useful. Could someone please compare it by DPM (Damage per Minute) instead? --[[User:Trifler|Trifler]] 03:26, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

:all tier x heavies' guns compared:
:e-100 
:* 2250 dpm, 750 alpha, 235 pen, 0,4 accuracy, 2,9 sec aim time
:is-7
:* 2146 dpm, 490 alpha, 260 pen, 0,4 acc, 3,4 sec
:maus 
:* 1975 dpm, 490 alpha, 246 pen, 0,38 acc, 2,9 sec
:is-4
:* 2200 dpm, 440 alpha, 268 pen, 0,38 acc, 2,9 sec
:t110e5
:* 2400 dpm, 400 alpha, 269 pen, 0,35 acc, 2 sec
:fv215b
:* 3200 dpm, 400 alpha, 269 pen, 0,32 acc, 1,7 sec - actually the best gun, except alpha. it's getting nerfed with 8.2.
:amx 50b
:* 9600 dpm, 400 alpha, 267 pen, 0,35 acc, 3 sec - 9600 until the drum is empty, 2560 overall.
:obviously, the t110e5 has a pretty good dpm value (and rate of fire).

::by the way: what would be a better substitute for ''above/below average HP''? ''has much health'' or something like that sounds even more stupid.
:: mfg, [[User:Killswitch247|Killswitch247]] 14:13, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
::Thanks for the dpm info. If health is particularly bad, you can write "low hit points". For particularly good you can write "high hit points". If you don't think it's enough to justify "low" or "high" then it's better not to list it at all. --[[User:Trifler|Trifler]] 15:21, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
:::okay [[User:Killswitch247|Killswitch247]] 15:30, 10 December 2012 (UTC)