Wargaming.net 위키에 오신 것을 환영합니다!
변수
/
World of Tanks

T110E5

사용자의 2014년 5월 9일 (금) 17:31 판
(비교) ← 이전 판 | 최신판 (비교) | 다음 판 → (비교)
이동: 둘러보기, 검색

The Damage per round under Cons isn't very useful. Could someone please compare it by DPM (Damage per Minute) instead? --Trifler 03:26, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

all tier x heavies' guns compared:
e-100
  • 2250 dpm, 750 alpha, 235 pen, 0,4 accuracy, 2,9 sec aim time
is-7
  • 2146 dpm, 490 alpha, 260 pen, 0,4 acc, 3,4 sec
maus
  • 1975 dpm, 490 alpha, 246 pen, 0,38 acc, 2,9 sec
is-4
  • 2200 dpm, 440 alpha, 268 pen, 0,38 acc, 2,9 sec
t110e5
  • 2400 dpm, 400 alpha, 269 pen, 0,35 acc, 2 sec
fv215b
  • 3200 dpm, 400 alpha, 269 pen, 0,32 acc, 1,7 sec - actually the best gun, except alpha. it's getting nerfed with 8.2.
amx 50b
  • 9600 dpm, 400 alpha, 267 pen, 0,35 acc, 3 sec - 9600 until the drum is empty, 2560 overall.
obviously, the t110e5 has a pretty good dpm value (and rate of fire).
by the way: what would be a better substitute for above/below average HP? has much health or something like that sounds even more stupid.
mfg, Killswitch247 14:13, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the dpm info. If health is particularly bad, you can write "low hit points". For particularly good you can write "high hit points". If you don't think it's enough to justify "low" or "high" then it's better not to list it at all. --Trifler 15:21, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
okay Killswitch247 15:30, 10 December 2012 (UTC)