Catapult Fighter Data
Revision as of 08:47, 18 February 2019 → Non-Catapult Fighters new section | Revision as of 08:48, 18 February 2019 | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | |||
== Non-Catapult Fighters == | == Non-Catapult Fighters == | |||
? | The column column heading Catapult Fighter is not appropriate for carrier-launched fighters. We're using two new terms: CAP Fighter (self-defense) and Patrol Fighter (called by squadrons). I'll change the heading to 'Fighter'. [[User:iDuckman:na|iDuckman:na]] ([[User talk:iDuckman:na|talk]]) 08:47, 18 February 2019 (UTC) | + | Glad to see carrier consumables here now. The column column heading Catapult Fighter is not appropriate for carrier-launched fighters. We're using two new terms: CAP Fighter (self-defense) and Patrol Fighter (called by squadrons). I'll change the heading to 'Fighter'. [[User:iDuckman:na|iDuckman:na]] ([[User talk:iDuckman:na|talk]]) 08:47, 18 February 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:48, 18 February 2019
Disrupting enemy attacks??
Is this still true?
Most importantly, it slows down enemy planes, holding fighters in place and reducing torpedo and dive bomber accuracy.
iDuckman:na (talk) 23:44, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Answer: No. Fighter attacks no longer affect aiming etc..
- https://worldofwarships.com/en/news/development/cv8-how-to-play/#aircraft-characteristics
iDuckman:na (talk)
Non-Catapult Fighters
Glad to see carrier consumables here now. The column column heading Catapult Fighter is not appropriate for carrier-launched fighters. We're using two new terms: CAP Fighter (self-defense) and Patrol Fighter (called by squadrons). I'll change the heading to 'Fighter'. iDuckman:na (talk) 08:47, 18 February 2019 (UTC)