Vickers Medium Mk. III
Vickers Medium Mk. III
Mouse over "
[Client Values; Actual values in
40,000 Cost |
475100 HP Hit Points |
17.5/187.17/19.5 t Weight Limit |
- Commander
- Gunner
- Driver
- Radio Operator
- Radio Operator
- Loader
180220 hp Engine Power |
48/16 km/h Speed Limit |
3032 deg/s Traverse |
10.2930.68 hp/t Power/Wt Ratio |
NoNo Pivot |
// mm Hull Armor |
14/14/1414/14/14 mm Turret Armor |
AP/APCR/HE
AP//HE Shells |
0/800/0
35/1200/22 Shell Cost |
50/50/6570/70/95 HP Damage |
43/72/2357/72/29 mm Penetration |
r/m ▲
20 r/m Standard Gun ▲
20 Rate of Fire Standard Gun |
▲
Standard Gun
▼
Standard Gun
▲
1000 Standard Gun ▲
Standard Gun
▼
Standard Gun
▲
1400 Damage Per Minute Standard Gun |
m ▲
0.41 m With 50% Crew: 0.508 m ▲
0.44 Accuracy With 50% Crew: 0.545 m |
s 2.1 s 1.7 Aim time |
4040 deg/s Turret Traverse |
360° Gun Arc |
-8°/+16°-8°/+16° Elevation Arc |
220160 rounds Ammo Capacity |
2020 % Chance of Fire |
m 310 m 330 View Range |
m 250 m 375 Signal Range |
III
40000
The Vickers Medium Mk. III is a British tier 3 medium tank.
British medium tank also known as the Vickers "16-tonners". Three prototypes were produced by Vickers from 1926 through 1931. According to some sources, three more tanks were manufactured in 1933 and remained in service through 1938 but never saw action.
The MK III is rather slow, yet capable of dealing its share of damage due to the excellent quality of its guns. They have fairly good accuracy and a high rate of fire. Despite that, the armor is weak and the tank can be destroyed easily, especially with HE rounds or artillery fire. The Mk. III is well suited for shooting at distances and taking cover when the enemy has finally noticed you're a threat and starts to point his gun at you. Beware of the Cruiser Mk. II, Alecto, Valentine AT, Type 91 and Type 95 Heavy and the Hetzer, as their HE shells can easily destroy an exposed Medium III.
The Vickers Medium Mk. III marks the end of its British medium line.
Modules / Available Equipment and Consumables
Modules
Tier | Engine | Engine Power (hp) |
Chance of Fire on Impact (%) |
Weight (kg) |
Price ()
| |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
III | 2x Armstrong Siddeley | 180 | 20 | 400 | 4550 | |
IV | 2x Rolls-Royce Phantom II | 220 | 20 | 680 | 10000 |
Tier | Suspension | Load Limit (т) |
Traverse Speed (gr/sec) |
Rmin | Weight (kg) |
Price ()
| |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
II | Vickers Medium A6E1 | 18 | 30 | B/2 | 4000 | 670 | |
III | Vickers Medium A6E3 | 19.5 | 32 | B/2 | 4000 | 1800 |
Tier | Radio | Signal Range (m) |
Weight (kg) |
Price ()
| |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
II | WS No. 14 | 250 | 40 | 0 | |
V | WS No. 9 | 375 | 40 | 3600 | |
III | WS No. 11 | 350 | 40 | 600 |
Compatible Equipment
Compatible Consumables
Player Opinion
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- 6-pdr gun has respectable alpha damage and RoF
- 2-pdr gun has great accuracy and penetration
- Accuracy penalty on movement and turret traverse is relatively small
- 2nd highest HP pool in tier 3.
Cons:
- Sub-par survivability; Won't last long in frontal engagements.
- Undesirable speeds, with top tier engine, makes it hard to keep up with shifting fights.
- Upgrading to the 2-pdr cuts alpha damage by much, while the 6-pdr has slow shell velocity
- Crew slot matches neither the previous vehicle nor the next in branch
Performance
This tank has six crew members, like the Cruiser Mk. II. Unfortunately, instead of two Gunners, it has two Radio Operators. The limited range of even the top radio on this tank means the second provides no worthwhile benefit. The new hull is far less boxy in shape, and slightly shorter in height, which allows this tank to use bushes a little more effectively. The 6-pdr 8cwt QF Mark I gun carries over from the Mark II, it has a faster rate of fire, better accuracy, and faster aim time on this tank, especially with the second turret. The top 2-pdr gun has somewhat low damage, but the accuracy and handling are simply incredible, and prepares the player better for the next vehicle, the Matilda.
A good Medium III player treats this tank as a second-assault vehicle, letting the forward advance to engage the enemy while the Medium III supports from the rear; Using it's accurate guns to take out threats from greater distances, and in short order. It's armor does fare well against Lights however, with even the Pz. I C's Mauser's shots bouncing off it's armor with good deflection. This allows it to square off in an anti-Light role.
Early Research
- The 6-pdr 8cwt QF Mark I gun and the WS No. 11 radio carry over from the Vickers Medium Mark II and can be equipped immediately.
- Research the upgraded suspension first.
- Next research the second turret.
- Researching the 2x Rolls-Royce Phantom II engine will improve mobility.
- Go from there.
Suggested Equipment
Gallery
Historical Info
In 1926, the British War Office wanted to replace their existing Mark II tanks with a new design. In May the Royal Tank Corps Centre was asked for its opinion, which it submitted in July. One of the requirements was a weight limit of 15.5 tons, which led to the nickname "16-tonners". Other specifications included that it could transported by rail; a sufficient supply of lubrication oil to match the range of the tank (dictated by the fuel carried); a wireless set; a gun capable of defeating enemy armour at a range of at least a thousand yards; fuel tanks external to the main compartments and bottom armour sufficient to withstand heavy machine-gun fire when exposed while climbing a crest. Furthermore the machine should be as silent as possible, as with previous types the engine noise tended to incapacitate the crew.
The War Office added some extra requirements: a separate engine compartment; superior steering capacity and 13 millimetres frontal armour with 9 millimetres thickness for the other plates.
In September Vickers, given the order to build a prototype, proposed a first design based on the Vickers A1E1 Independent, with the fighting compartment in front and the engine compartment at the back. There would be a central two-man turret with a 3-pounder (47 mm) gun and a coaxial machine-gun; it was intended to house the commander and a special observer, each being provided a separate cupola. In the front of the hull were to be placed two secondary machine-gun turrets, each with a twin Vickers machine gun. At the back of the vehicle, behind the main turret a third machine-gun turret was intended, armed with an anti-aircraft (AA) weapon. A crew was needed of seven men. Maximum armour would be 13 millimetres and basis armour 6.5 millimetres, limiting the weight to fourteen tons. Riveted plates were used. The total fuel supply would be 120 imp gal (550 l) gallons: ten in a small tank inside, gravity feeding the engine; the remainder in external tanks on the fenders. Two engine options were indicated: a 120 hp engine would allow for a speed of 14 mph and a 180 hp engine would raise this to 20 mph (32 km/h).
The result was called A6. In March 1927 a wooden mock-up was presented and after approval a second and prototype were ordered which had to incorporate the new hydraulically operated Wilson epicyclic steering gearbox, the predecessor of the Merrit-Brown gearbox. By June 1928 both prototypes (A6E1 and A6E2) were presented to the Mechanized Warfare Experimental Establishment for trials. Vickers was on this occasion ordered to add armour skirts but keep within the weight limit even if it meant removing armour elsewhere. Meanwhile a third prototype had been ordered: A6E3.
A6E1, A6E2 and A6E3 were fitted with a Armstrong Siddeley air-cooled V8 180 hp engine giving a maximum speed of 26 mph. A6E2 was fitted with the Ricardo CI 180 hp engine but this was not satisfactory and the Armstrong-Siddeley refitted. A6E3 was later re-engined with the Thornycroft 6V 500 hp - a slow running marine engine. It was proposed to combine two Rolls-Royce Phantom engines with the Wilson transmission system on the A6E1, but in view of the costs this was rejected. A6E2 was eventually refitted with the AS V8 180 hp.
The guns were tested in July 1928. This proved that the twin-machine gun arrangement was unworkable; so the A6E3, then being constructed, was fitted with a simplified design with a single machine-gun; it also had single cupola on the centreline of the turret. The AA-turret was removed from A6E1. However it was also shown that the suspension and the gunnery arrangements were distinctly inferior to those of the Mark II. It was therefore decided to discontinue the development of the type and use the three vehicles merely as test-beds for the automotive parts. In 1929 Vickers submitted three alternative suspension designs, which were fitted to the respective prototypes; one of these, tried on A6E3, involved a fundamental reconstruction of the hull. None proved able to provide a stable gun platform. Only in 1934 a satisfactory type was fitted by a specialised firm.[1]
The disappointments in the A6 design led to a new design, the "Medium Mark III", being ordered in 1928 and constructed from 1930.[2] It was similar to the A6 design but featured a new turret and improved armour. The turret had a flat gun mantlet and a bulge at the back to hold the radio set. The secondary machine-gun turrets were moved more to the front to shift the centre of gravity of the entire vehicle forward to improve its stability. Larger brakes were fitted. In 1933 trials were completed of the first two prototypes. The type was reliable and provided a good gun platform. However, it still suffered from its bad suspension design: even though road speed increased to thirty miles per hour, during cross-country rides the bogies were often overloaded. Three Mark IIIs were built, one by Vickers and two by the Royal Ordnance Factory at Woolwich: Medium III E1, E2 and E3. The third had an improved suspension and the vehicles were in 1934 taken into use by the HQ of the Tank Brigade. However, no orders followed due to its high price; Medium III E2 was lost to a fire.
One of the Mark IIIs was fitted as a command vehicle with an extra radio aerial around the turret. This was used by Brigadier Percy Hobart for the Salisbury Plain exercises during 1934.[
Historical Gallery
Historical Accuracy Errata
The 3-pdr gun was its only main armament. The other gun configurations are fake.
- Historical Thornycroft 6V 500 hp engine is missing. This was fitted to the third prototype.
- The Rolls-Royce Phantom engines was only a proposal that was rejected on the grounds of expense.